Study in Canada
Study in USA
Decide on the assessment outcome
Decide whether the academic credential is comparable to those in Canada and determine the rights conferred by the assessment outcome.
For internal procedures:
Decide whether the academic credential:
grants full recognition when no substantial differences have been identified;
grants alternative recognition with respect to a different purpose than the one initially identified in the application process;
grants partial recognition when some substantial differences have been identified;
grants conditional recognition when some substantial differences have been identified but full recognition may be possible if specific requirements are met within a specific timeframe;
is not recognized.
Establish the rights conferred by the comparability assessment outcome and how the credential may be used by the applicant.
COMPLY WITH THE PAN-CANADIAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS (QAF)
This step complies with the
guiding principles 9 and 11 of QAF.
Consult QAF to get more information. CONSULT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
You may find useful information in other resources, such as:
EAR Consortium (EP-Nuffic, UK NARIC, ENIC-NARIC France, and ENIC-NARIC Poland). (2012).
European Area of Recognition (EAR) Manual, chapter 11; EAR-HEI Consortium (EP-Nuffic, ENIC-NARIC France, ENIC-NARIC Latvia, ENIC-NARIC Ireland, European University Association (EUA), ENIC-NARIC Lithuania, ENIC-NARIC Denmark, ENIC-NARIC Poland and Tuning Educational Structures in Europe). (2016).
European Recognition Manual for Higher Education Institutions (EAR-HEI), part II, item 10.
International Education Guides